There are two basic ways that Web 2.0 revenue sharing sites work:
1. Directly sharing Google Adsense / Chitika / Amazon revenue
2. Indirectly paying out revenue share based on views or some version of views
For direct Adsense sharing sites like Xomba and Infobarrel shine. You get the power of the big site and they take care of all the backend work. You just have to do the writing (SEO friendly writing of course) and build some links to your work. The rest is just done for you.
For the better sites like Bukisa, Infobarrel and Xomba, the ad revenue sharing system is pretty simple and transparent – you and the site each get a cut. Some sites like Infobarrel also encourage bloggers to help grow the site by paying out referrals (a small percentage of earnings by recruited writers).
One of the keys to success on Adsense sharing sites is to write with a focus on high value Adsense keywords while using keywords that will draw search traffic.
For sites like Associated Content payouts are based on views instead of a share of ad clicks. To earn well you just need to draw traffic with good links, good keywords, and social media. You don’t really need to worry about looking for those high value per click keywords.
Also, some topics lend themselves to Adsense well while others are not as likely to earn directly. A person looking for information say copper investing is more likely to click ads than someone casually browsing something they spotted posted to your Facebook wall.
In either case though, more traffic equals more earnings overall. When considering where you will post a particular article consider where it is likely to earn more – by the view or by the click – and select your site accordingly.
Regardless, you will want to do some backlinking to improve your search engine position and otherwise create traffic. This Bukisa article explores ways to increase traffic to Bukisa articles (but these ideas will work for any revenue share site). Another effective way to build search engine page authority and create more search traffic is to write about your topics on multiple sites and build one way links between the various pages.
Yes, I like to generate passive referral income by providing valuable information on how to make money writing online, so if you are not signed up for any of these revenue sharing sites, please use these referral links:
Infobarrel or Xomba






















{ 2 trackbacks }
{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
Awww, I wish I waited because I just signed up for Bukisa on Friday.
Right now I’m exploring Helium but I do plan to branch out toward Infobarrel and Bukisa in the near future. I think it’s best to diversify your approach – go with some click sites, traffic and affiliate methods.
This way you could learn which works best for you, keep a wide range of articles on the web and really build up some great passive income while doing so.
.-= Murlu´s last blog ..Tips And Tricks To Get The Most Out Of Helium =-.
I’ve not used Helium yet. I’ll check out your post about it.
.-= JadeDragon´s last blog ..Revenue Sharing Sites – By the Click or By the View =-.
Squidoo and ehow have been a good source of passive income and also allow you to gain new readers to your personal blog. In fact, squidoo has many ways you can earn income: clickbank, adsense, amazon, etc.
.-= Scott´s last blog ..Google Ad sense Review =-.
Good points. eHow is somewhat out of commission – I’ve still got articles there but I don’t like submitting to a CE and than never being able to tweak the article again. Also, I write about the need to interlink your work – but you can’t do that with Demand Studios. For me, there are better choices listed on the Resources Page of this blog.
Great article, thanks for sharing this. I have subscribed to your RSS feed and am looking forward to reading more from you.
Keep up the good work and don’t stop posting please.
Thanks for the complement.
.-= JadeDragon´s last blog ..Public Speaking for the Blogger =-.
I definitely believe in diversifying the income. Normally I’m for the click or affiliate model because it usually makes more money than the per view, but with Associated Content I’ve made some good passive income from the PPV on topics that never seem to have advertising, so there is definitely a time and place for both. As for the comments, I’ll admit I haven’t written there in a year, but I have serious reservations about Helium.com and they are one of the few writing websites I’ve worked with that I refuse to recommend, for whatever two cents that’s worth. I’ll say I’ve had really bad experiences there, and leave it at that, but that’s my professional opinion of them. I linked my old Helium Review to my name for anyone who’s interested in a more in depth look. Thanks for the good blog post discussing per view payment versus per click.
.-= Master Dayton´s last blog ..Celebrating Writing Milestones! =-.
Always happy to see dialog in the comments.
.-= JadeDragon´s last blog ..Public Speaking for the Blogger =-.